Entry 266-2 Build in Public 1 min ↩ back to the timeline

When everyone uses the same AI

Julia switches her image tool from Nano Banana back to Recraft, and the reason is a fresh liability. Nano Banana's images are genuinely good, and the ones she made of Severo are good, but because so many people explored the same model, its style became instantly recognizable, 'ah, that's Nano Banana', 'that's Gemini', which on Reddit trips the anti-AI reflex where people go irrational and invalidate everything over that one detail. Recraft, a vector tool she's used since around 2022, has unique styles and is scalable and lightweight (vectors are math, not painted pixels). The deeper point: a shared AI tool's output is a devalued commodity style, so you differentiate with a distinct one. And she pushes back on the assumption underneath the dislikes, that if it's AI it took no work: Severo's face and the logo were prueba-prueba-prueba, refined until they no longer looked generated. Making something with AI doesn't mean it took no time; the refinement is the work, and a recognizable style is the tell that skipped it.

video fuente → Source video thumbnail
Source transmission · “0 to 1 Million” diary

// trace: where this idea came from

Julia switches her image tool from Nano Banana back to Recraft, and the reason is a fresh liability. Nano Banana’s images are genuinely good, and the ones she made of Severo are good, but because so many people explored the same model, its style became instantly recognizable, “ah, that’s Nano Banana”, “that’s Gemini”, which on Reddit trips the anti-AI reflex where people go irrational and invalidate everything over that one detail ▸ 29:55. Recraft, a vector tool she’s used since around 2022, back when she was doing vectors for a German internship and everyone else was flooding the world with Midjourney images, has unique styles and is scalable and lightweight, because a vector is math, coordinates, not painted pixels.

cuando todos usan la misma IA, su estilo se vuelve reconocible y se devalúa →

The deeper point is that a shared AI tool’s output is a commodity style, devalued precisely because it’s everywhere, so you differentiate with a distinct one, even landing on something that looks hand-drawn. And she pushes back on the assumption underneath the dislikes, that if it’s AI it took no work. Severo’s face was prueba-prueba-prueba, refined until it no longer looked generated, and the logo the same ▸ 33:00. Making something with AI doesn’t mean it took no time; the refinement is the work, and a recognizable style is the tell of the person who skipped it…

// continued in

la lista es el activo →

Continues

One distilled teaching per entry, straight from the video diary. Leave your email and get the next one the day it lands.