The pipeline that forgets your name
A one-pager study of Anthropic's Clio becomes a design document for Reisi: Haiku summarizes without names, embeddings cluster the meanings, Sonnet audits and builds the taxonomy, and nobody ever reads your chat. An intent-based bank will need exactly this, because keywords can't tell love from hate.
// trace: where this idea came from
- ↳ video diary @ 30:55 (Clio: analizar anónimamente las conversaciones)
- ↳ video diary @ 36:58 (Reisi es intent based, necesita esto)
- ↳ Entry 174-1: Intent, not inventory (la intención como interfaz, ahora como analítica)
The paper is Anthropic’s Clio, the system built “para analizar anónimamente todos los las conversaciones” ▸ 30:55, and his walkthrough keeps the architecture’s logic intact. You can’t put a human on the chats, that’s a privacy violation by definition, so the anonymization is done by models distilling models. Haiku, the light one, summarizes each conversation ▸ 31:35 under orders to omit names, locations, and unique identifiers ▸ 32:10; his counterexample of why that instruction matters is domestic: “A Julia le gusta hablar sobre anime” is already too personal ▸ 32:19. The summaries get vectorized and clustered so related topics drift together ▸ 32:38, Sonnet audits what passes so only the generalized survives ▸ 33:47, then builds the taxonomy, programming, then data science, then machine learning ▸ 34:12, with a separate map for the unknowns that fit no category ▸ 35:03. Reported fidelity: about 96% ▸ 35:44.
las keywords cuentan clics; la intención necesita significado →
Why a fintech vlog spends ten minutes on this: “es precisamente un concepto que podemos utilizar para nuestro propio proyecto” ▸ 36:00. Traditional product analytics counts clicks; a text interface has nothing to count ▸ 36:34. And Reisi is intent based by design: people will say what they want to do with their money ▸ 36:58. Keywords are the tempting shortcut and his rebuttal is compact: “odio la programación” makes a keyword system recommend programming courses ▸ 37:49, and if keywords were enough, nobody would have built Clio ▸ 37:23. The privacy half is just as load-bearing for a bank: what Pepito Pérez wanted to pay for is nobody’s business; the system should only ever learn which payment rail he was missing ▸ 38:14…
// continued in
no entry has continued this idea yet: the arc is still open