Product risk, market risk
The Mom Test hands him a compass: some ideas fail in the building, others fail in the wanting, and only the second kind can be validated by asking. It reclassifies the whole portfolio, and retroactively explains the blockchain project his professor could never quite reject out loud.
// trace: where this idea came from
- ↳ video diary @ 2:25 (el videojuego no se valida preguntando)
- ↳ video diary @ 9:08 (en investigación, el mejor gana)
- ↳ video diary @ 15:27 (Julia: nombrar el problema lo aclara)
The concept, from the pirated Mom Test he promises to buy when there’s money ▸ 0:18: every idea sits on a spectrum between product risk and market risk ▸ 0:56. A videogame is pure product risk, no survey can tell you if it’s fun before it exists ▸ 2:25, and so is anything whose answer is trivially yes: would you use the cure for cancer, would you buy the thing that sells 50% more ▸ 3:59. There the real questions are technical: can we build it, will it work, does the budget survive it, his home-diamond-machine example ▸ 5:39. Market risk asks the opposite set: does anyone want this, is the pain worth money, are there enough of them, the smart fridge that reorders your fruit being a thing you can build that nobody may pay for ▸ 6:14.
Then he runs the portfolio through it. Homigo sits in the middle, its matching algorithm an unproven technical bet ▸ 7:25; the notes app, Divo and Piqui are market risk, the tech exists, the question is whose pain it removes ▸ 7:45; Query Network is product risk in its purest form, and research adds a brutal clause, the best implementation takes everything, a 98% solution loses to a 99% one ▸ 8:28.
si la respuesta obvia es “sí, lo usaría”, la encuesta sobra y el riesgo es técnico →
The payoff is a cold case solved. His university venture project, Makia, salary and spending entirely on the blockchain, sounded excellent on paper and died at the fair ▸ 10:22. Now he can name why: it was a product-risk idea in a market-risk classroom, satisfaction surveys were useless, “si eso funciona como usted dice, tome mi plata” ▸ 11:43, and when questioned he had feelings about the blockchain instead of answers ▸ 13:45. The professors banned blockchain projects afterward without ever articulating the principle ▸ 12:16; the fair’s “boring” recycling and ice-cream ideas were simply the ones whose risk students could actually test ▸ 14:10. Julia’s verdict covers the whole entry: it isn’t a new idea, “darle nombre a los problemas lo deja todo más claro” ▸ 15:27…