Mad with power, for four days

The clock is the strategy: 1,000 cloud credits, expiring in days ▸ 0:52. The morning meeting is one instruction, delivered to Julia and Carlos in full caps energy: stop everything, structure every project you have, and put this thing to work 24/7, “vamos a enloquecer de poder” ▸ 7:52. Severo and Piqui pause; the dormant portfolio wakes: Koby, Divo, Sanfanson, LorenaMor, all connected to GitHub and handed to the agent for market research, refactor plans, roadmaps ▸ 2:19.

The receipt that reframes the $100 subscription arrives inside the deliverables: the agent’s own project plan includes a cost analysis, 17 to 20 weeks, $6,000, for work now included in the flat fee, across as many projects as they can feed it ▸ 4:22. It’s the Replit CEO’s prophecy he quoted months ago, code trending to zero, visibly close ▸ 4:52, and his edge thesis follows: 99% of people don’t know this exists yet, so the window belongs to whoever exploits it now ▸ 5:12, with Apple’s rumored mini-app store as corroborating weather ▸ 5:52.

créditos que expiran son la única deadline que esta empresa siempre respeta →

The discipline inside the frenzy is worth recording: live projects stay untouched, because his belief that the agent doesn’t break code is still a theory, so it gets tested on parallels and duplicates, never on Severo ▸ 8:36. And so does the doubt he refuses to swallow: the rat-race analogy resurfaces, months of building app after app while advancing a few small steps, and the free credits have an obvious price, the labs harvest all of it to train the next model, “¿estamos trabajando para nosotros o trabajando para la IA?” ▸ 10:05. The question gets asked, the credits get spent anyway, and both of those are probably correct…